Richard J. K. v. State, Division of Child & Family Services

OPINION

Appellant Richard contends that the district court erred in terminating his parental rights because there was no clear and con*739vincing evidence that termination would serve his children’s best interests or that there was parental fault. We disagree. The record includes substantial evidence that termination is in the children’s best interests, and Richard failed to overcome the statutory presumption that his children’s best interests would be served by termination. Additionally, unlike our recent cases, Matter of Parental Rights as to Q.L.R.1 and Matter of Parental Rights as to J.L.N.,2…