Tammila G. v. State, Department of Human Resources
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Becker, J.:
In this appeal, we consider two issues. First, we consider whether the State must prove the existence of an adoptive place ment for a child before a court can terminate a parent’s rights to that child. Second, we decide which party has the burden to present evidence of a child’s desires, under NRS 128.107(2), in a parental rights termination case when the State has established the presumption under NRS 128.109(2) that it is in the child’s best interest for the parent’s rights to be terminated.
We first conclude that neither state nor federal law on parental…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allianz Insurance v. GagnonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Drury v. LangNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Vincent L. G. v. State Division of Child & Family Services, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Diana L. N. v. State, Department of Human Resources, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Kobinski v. State, Welfare Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Quiana M. B. v. State Department of Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Charles C.L.A. v. State Division of Child & Family Services, Department of Health & Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Department of Social & Health Services v. DabbaghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Dawn M. v. Nevada State Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Washoe County Department of Social Services v. Kory L.G.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.