Legal Opinion

Downey v. Vavold

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. 33279PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal challenging the district court’s determination that the plaintiffs had failed to prove a boundary by agreement. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Morris and Dixie Vavold Family Trust (Trust) owns a parcel of real property that is about six and one-half acres in size. The western boundary of the property is essen tially a straight, north-south line. The Plaintiffs, Krystal Downey, David and Diana Presley, Larry and Nancy Worthy, and Weston and Elizabeth Loegering are the owners of four contiguous parcels that each abuts the western boundary of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thomas v. MadsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. KMST, LLC. v. County of AdaIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wells v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Owen v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Teton Peaks Investment Co. v. OhmeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Woods v. SandersIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. FLYING ELK INVESTMENT, LLC v. CornwallIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API