Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Madsen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2006No. 31172PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an implied easement by prior use and awarding attorney fees under Idaho Code § 12-121. We uphold the finding of an easement and reverse the award of attorney fees.

I.FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May 5,1970, defendant Dale J. Thomas (Thomas) and his wife purchased a 50-acre parcel of property from Dale’s father. The property had been in his family since 1878. It is almost-square in shape and is bounded on its southern side by a public highway. There is also a canal that runs diagonally across the property from the southwest to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. McGrew v. McGrewIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. BHA Investments, Inc. v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stonebrook Constraction, LLC v. Chase Home Finance, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kiebert v. GossIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Capstar Radio Operating Co. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API