Legal Opinion

United States v. Allmon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2010No. 09-1440PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Julian Alimón entered into a plea agreement under which he agreed to testify for the Government. After testifying at his uncle’s trial, pursuant to his plea agreement, the Government called Appellant to testify in a subsequent trial against his cousins. Appellant refused, citing the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The district court 1 found that Appellant had no Fifth Amendment privilege and found him guilty of contempt. Following the guidelines’ instructions in regard to contempt, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2J1.1 (2009), the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Earnest Washington, United States of America v. Wendell E. FortenberryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United Automobile Insurance Company v. VeluchamyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. United States v. Terry Dean IcemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. David MuskCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Rudolph StankoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Allmon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API