United States v. Rudolph Stanko
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
As a condition of his supervised release, Rudolph George Stanko was required to complete a PosNConviction Risk Assessment (PCRA) form given to him by his probation officer. The form instructed Stanko to respond, using a four-point scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “disagree,” to questions that had little relevance to the offenses he had been convicted of, 1 such as “[wjhen pressured by life’s problems I have said ‘the hell with it’ and followed this up by using drugs or engaging in crime,” and “I have justified selling drugs, burglarizing homes, or robbing banks by telling myself that if…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Michael Owsley v. Al Luebbers, Superintendent, Michael Owsley v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Rudolph George StankoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barbara Williams v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Isaac MaxieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Octavius CoplenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018