Legal Opinion

United States v. David Musk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2013No. 12-3320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted David L. Musk on three counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Musk testified at trial. After his brief direct testimony, the government cross-examined him. Musk attempted to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights. The district court 1 ruled that the scope of the cross-examination was proper, and thus that Musk waived his rights as to the questioning. Musk appeals, asserting that his cross-examination testimony was improperly compelled. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

I

David L. Musk operated an investment business in Omaha.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. DeLeon-Reyes v. GuevaraDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Solache v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API