Hull v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Certiorari to the Superior Court of the county of Shasta to review certain orders made in a summary proceeding to recover books and papers pertaining to the offices of sheriff and tax collector of that county. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice McKee.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This is a proceeding by certiorari to review a proceeding had in the Superior Court of Shasta County. It appears by the record returned in the proceeding that on the 8th day of January, 1883, W. E. Hopping, claiming to be the sheriff and tax collector of the county of Shasta, and the incumbent in office, commenced the proceeding by filing a petition against Sylvester Hull and Robert Kennedy to compel them to deliver to him the books and papers belonging to the office in their possession, which it was alleged they had refused to deliver to him on demand. Hull and Kennedy appeared in the pro*175ceed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Smith v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
- People v. SassovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Satterlee v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walcott v. WellsNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. SehornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People ex rel. Finigan v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.