Legal Opinion
Trico Products Corporation v. Apco-Mossberg Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 26, 1930No. 2469, 2470PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
These are cross-appeals from a decision of the District Court holding that one claim of a patent for a windshield wiper was not a valid claim and that the second claim as stated in the patent was valid.
The Trico Products Corporation, assignee of the patent, appeals from the ruling of the court below that the first claim is invalid, and the Apco-Mossberg Corporation appeals from the ruling that the second claim is valid, and that it had infringed upon it.
The invention claimed by the plaintiff, as described in the patentee’s application and drawings shown below, consists…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.