Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 21, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00094PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

Lieutenant Colonel David R. Smith (Lt. Col. Smith or plaintiff) claims that he was entitled to certain job protections specified in the Air National Guard Instructions (ANGI). 1 He asserts that the Tennessee Air National Guard violated these instructions when it failed to restore him to a position in the Active Guard Reserve following a tour of duty he performed at the Naval War College. 2 See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 4.1-4.2, 4.4, ECF No. 7; see also Pl.’s Br. Supp. Summ. J. Admin. R. 3-4, ECF No. 19 (Pl.’s Mot. for JAR).

Lt. Col. Smith also claims that his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Raytheon Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Coastal Environmental Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Can Softtech, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  5. Competitive Innovations, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API