Coastal Environmental Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Bid Protest; Supplemental Administrative Record; RCFC 11(e)(3), Order to Show Cause; RCFC 11(b)(3), Factual Basis for Representations to the Court; RCFC 11(c)(2), Motion for Sanctions; Inherent Power to Sanction; Backdated Document; Affidavit That Conflicts With Other Materials; Sanctions Imposed
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
This bid protest concerns the procurement of soil remediation services by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). In its initial complaint, plaintiff contended that the contracting officer improperly awarded the contract to another bidder despite her…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gallup, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Fritz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.