Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 26, 2015No. 2014-5090UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Lieutenant Colonel David R. Smith appeals a decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, Smith v. United States, 114 Fed.Cl. 691 (2014), sustaining the government’s position that Lt. Col. Smith is not entitled to restoration to a position with the Active Guard Reserve (“AGR”). To prevail on appeal, Lt. Col. Smith must establish that the court’s decision was “arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to law.” Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991, 998 (Fed.Cir.2006); Smith, 114 Fed.Cl. at 700.

BACKGROUND

From 1993 to February 2002,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Competitive Innovations, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Homeland Security Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Insight Public Sector, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Tellus Strategies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API