Legal Opinion

City of Winfield v. Bell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1913No. 18,008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This case involves the validity of a provision of the road law recently enacted which requires the payment of a poll tax and provides that any one failing to pay the tax shall, upon conviction, be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor. (Laws 1911, ch. 248, § 36.) The appellant resisted the payment of the tax on the ground that the provision imposing a penalty for nonpayment is not within the title of the act. The title is, “An act in relation to roads and highways,” and repealing certain acts and parts of acts which are named. This is one of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowman v. CockrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. City of La Harpe v. Elm Township Gas, Light, Fuel & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Harrod v. Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Woodruff v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Water District No. 1 v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Costello v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API