Legal Opinion

Costello v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1914No. 18,628PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Riley district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover for the death of her husband occasioned by the falling of "a bridge over which he was attempting to pass with a traction engine. The petition alleged that it was impracticable to plank the bridge, and that on account of its weak condition the laying of planks or boards would not have prevented its breaking and falling. A demurrer to the petition was sustained and the plaintiff appeals. The question involved concerns the construction of three statutes. The plaintiff contends that unless the failure to plank the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. PauleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. First National Bank v. PearceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. City of Winfield v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Rothrock v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API