Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 23, 1991No. Court 90-06-00313PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), moves to amend its Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the rules of this Court, to add a claim that the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce (“ITA” or “Commerce”), may not apply the so-called assessment rate cap under section 737 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1673f, to entries which importers herein entered under bond between June 1974 and August 1976. Timken brings this claim now because of this court’s ruling in Zenith Elec. Corp. v. United States, 15 CIT -, 770 F.Supp. 648…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Consumer Products Division, Scm Corporation, the United States, Party-In-Interest v. Silver Reed America, Inc. And Silver Seiko, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Saarstahl AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.