Legal Opinion

Consumer Products Division, Scm Corporation, the United States, Party-In-Interest v. Silver Reed America, Inc. And Silver Seiko, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 28, 1985No. Appeal 84-1118PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from the February 1, 1984 decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade 1 and concerns administration of the antidumping law, 19 U.S.C. § 1673 et seq. Upon holding invalid a portion of the regulations implementing the statute, namely, the “ESP offset cap” contained in 19 C.F.R. § 353.15(c), the court certified the question for immediate appeal. Our jurisdiction is found at 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(1). We conclude that the regulation is valid.

I

Under the antidumping provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, 19…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. CorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Fulman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Alhambra Foundry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API