Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Buckley & Scott, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 2, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiff brings this bill to restrain the defendant from removing an oil storage tank and a Nokol Automatic Oil Heater from a single dwelling house owned and occupied by him. He took title to the premises on May 20, 1931. At that time the tank and heater were in the premises, and he knew nothing of the circumstances attending their installation.
By a contract dated September 21, 1928, Miller, a former *108owner of the house, contracted with Buckley & Scott, Inc., which was engaged in the business of selling, distributing and installing oil burners and equipment, for the “lease and rent” for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. Bay State Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Stone v. LivingstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Abeloff v. PeacardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Russell v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bay State York Co. v. Marvix, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Hannah v. FrawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Gar Wood Industries, Inc. v. Colonial Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Titcomb v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.