Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Frawley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 28, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The defendants Henry F. Frawley and Albert E. LaBelle are the owners of an equity of redemption, and the other defendants are their wives. One of them, Lillian R. LaBelle, owned a sectional “portable” building of the dimensions of twenty feet by thirty feet, exclusive of the front and back porches. This building was moved on rollers as a unit, from its former location one hundred fifty yards away, to the mortgaged premises, with the consent of the owners of the equity of redemption, and was set *30on sixteen wooden posts extending about four feet above the ground. The space under the building…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stuart v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Robinson v. PeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Medford Trust Co. v. Priggen Steel Garage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. Commonwealth Mortgage & Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. GouldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Holmes v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API