Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 1976No. 7408PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Petitioners O’Neill and Yarus were two of some 1,400 persons employed by the Department of General Services of the District of Columbia (DGS) at the time this controversy commenced in 1971. They occupied the positions of Engineering Technicians in the work order branch of the Bureau of Repairs and Improvements classified as a GS-12 and a GS-11, respectively. Neither of their positions, however, is in the competitive service. 1 See Respondent’s Supplemental Statement. 2
Petitioners alleged they were the victims of racial prejudice on the joh and engaged in a series of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ralph M. Hackley v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia CouncilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dupont Circle Citizen's Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lamont v. RogersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Porter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.