Pine v. Rogers

Ralph Rogers, defendant in error, plaintiff below, instituted suit against W. B. Pine, plaintiff in error, to recover damages for personal injuries.

The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals, alleging that the verdict and judgment is excessive, contrary to the law and evidence, and that the court erred in instructing the jury and in refusing to give certain instructions requested by the defendant. Defendant particularly complains of instructions numbered 6, 8, and 13.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a laborer on a hog ranch operated by the…