Legal Opinion
City of Pawhuska v. Crutchfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 2, 1932No. 20757PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
On May 22, 1926, William Edward Orutchfield, a minor, sustained an injury to his eyes by coming in contact with a loose live wire from the electric light plant owned and operated by the city of Pawhuska. He brought an action in the district court of Osage county to recover damages ■because of such injury and obtained a verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,250: The judgment was affirmed on appeal to this court. See City of Pawhuska v. Crutchfield, 147 Okla. 4, 293 P. 1095. The facts are stated in that opinion, and we do not deem it necessary to here restate them.
W. E. Orutchfield, father of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oklahoma Hospital v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CrinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jones v. SechtemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- City of Pawhuska v. CrutchfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Desua v. YokimCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Pine v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Griffin v. AsburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Collins v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.