Legal Opinion

Marcoz v. Summa Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1990No. 19874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an action by appellant Franco A. Marcoz (Marcoz) against his former employer Summa Corporation (Summa) for wrongful termination of employment. In a question of first impression, this court must determine whether a discharged employee’s allegation of bad faith termination for the purpose of saving or reducing the employer’s obligation for future contributions to the employee’s retirement plan is preempted by the provisions of section 510 of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (1982)). Marcoz is attempting to bring his…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Nevada Power Co. v. HaggertyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Allum v. Valley Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Madera v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API