Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1993No. 23022PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The district court granted respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange’s (“Farmers”) motion to dismiss appellant Sherry Pemberton’s bad faith claim. On appeal, Pemberton contends that the district court erroneously dismissed her bad faith claim because Nevada recognizes an implied covenant in automobile insurance policies that the insurance company will handle uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) claims fairly and in good faith. We agree.

Facts

On December 5, 1989, appellant Sherry Pemberton was involved in an automobile collision with John C. Grabow in Clark County, Nevada. Pemberton…

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. K Mart Corp. v. PonsockNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by89 opinions

  1. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Republic Insurance Co. v. StokerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API