Madera v. State Industrial Insurance System
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*255OPINION1
2Per curiam
These consolidated appeals concern actions alleging “bad-faith” administration of workers’ compensation claims. All of the matters were initiated prior to the effective date of NRS 616D.030, which prohibits the commencement or maintenance of such actions.
The district courts concluded that NRS 616D.030 mandated dismissal of the claims even though they were filed before the statute went into effect. The issue on appeal is whether this statute bars actions commenced, but not yet reduced to judgment, as of its effective date. We conclude that it does and, accordingly, affirm the judgments…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Smallwood v. GallardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Falline v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Sandpointe Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Holiday Retirement Corp. v. State Division of Industrial RelationsNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- J.D. Construction, Inc. v. IBEX International Group, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.