Legal Opinion
Seybold v. Neu
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 20, 2001No. 45505-2-IPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
To decide this appeal we must determine whether a reconstructive (plastic) surgeon practicing at the Scripps Clinic in California is competent to testify that (1) an orthopedic surgeon specializing in musculoskeletal oncology in Seattle overtreated a soft-tissue malignancy that had not invaded bone by removing approximately a third of the circumference of Charles Seybold’s right lower tibia bone during the surgical removal of the tumor; (2) the standard of care applicable to orthopedic surgeons specializing in musculoskeletal oncology and treating soft-tissue malignancies in Seattle in June…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Newton Insurance Agency & Brokerage, Inc. v. Caledonian Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Ross v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Taylor v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hill v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Davies v. Holy Family HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.