Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 29, 2014No. 70414-1-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Before the doctrine of judicial estoppel may be applied, a party’s initial position — which is subsequently contradicted in a different proceeding — must be accepted by the court to which it is presented. In a proceeding prior to the matter before us on appeal, appellant Reed Taylor’s initial position was rejected by the court to which it was presented. Nevertheless, in this matter, the King County Superior Court applied judicial estoppel, found insufficient evidence of proximate causation, and granted summary judgment in favor of the respondents. Given that Taylor1 did not successfully…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Northwest Cascade, Inc. v. Unique Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Sarah Gosney, Res/cross-apps. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Apps/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Thomas L. Sluman v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State Of Washington v. Terrance Jon IrbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API