Imperial Irr. Co. v. McKenzie
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Pecos County; W. C. Douglas, Judge. Action by T. N. McKenzie against the Imperial Irrigation Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This was an action by the appellee against the Imperial Irrigation Company and others for damages arising from trespasses by said company upon lands owned by the appellee. Upon trial before a jury, verdict was returned, and judgment thereon rendered in favor of the appellee against the Imperial Irrigation Company for the sum of $2,000.
[1] Rule 25 for the government of the Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xii) provides that an assignment of error must refer to that portion of the motion for a new trial in which the error is complained of. None of the assignments of error comply with this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Biggs v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Fessinger v. El Paso Times Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Nunn v. VealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taylor v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Lakeside Irr. Co. v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Texas Co. v. VelozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Cain v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Irving v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.