Legal Opinion

Cain v. Delaney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from El Paso County Court; A. 5. J. Eylar, Judge. Action by J. P. Delaney against William H. Cain. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This was a suit by Delaney against Cain for commissions alleged to be due for certain services rendered. Upon trial before a jury, verdict and judgment was rendered in favor of the appellee in the sum of $290.25.

[1] Rule 25 for the government of the Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xii) provides that an assignment of error must refer to that portion of the, motion for a new trial in which the error is complained of.- None of the assignments comply with this provision of the rule. They will therefore not be considered. Railway Co. v. Ledbetter, 153 S. W. 646; Nunn v. Yeale, 149 S. W. 758;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Biggs v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Fessinger v. El Paso Times Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Nunn v. VealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Waldon v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Irving v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Slaughter v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API