Legal Opinion

Nunn v. Veale

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Potter County Court; W. M. Jeter, Judge. Action by J. E. Nunn against J. W. Veale. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant ap,-peals. On motion to strike out appellant’s assignments of error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, C. J.

This case is before us at this time on appellee’s motion to strike out appellant’s assignments of error contained in the transcript and as brought forward in his brief, on the ground that said assignments, as well as the grounds in the motion for a new trial, on which they respectively are based, are too general and not in compliance with rule 24 for government of the Courts of Civil Appeals of Texas, as amended January 24, 1912 (142 S. W. xii); the specific contention apparently being that the rules as amended January 24, 1912, should be so construed as to require that the motion for a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Davidson v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. El Paso Electric Ry. Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co. v. Mercedes Plantation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. KidwellTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Texas Co. v. VelozCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API