Legal Opinion
James T. Hannon v. Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 7, 2000No. 99-3354PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This petition for review challenges the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), sustaining the agency’s determination that the petitioner was not a law enforcement officer and therefore was not entitled to enhanced retirement benefits under 5 U.S.C. § 8331(20). We affirm.
I
Federal law enforcement personnel may retire under the Civil Service Retirement System at age fifty with enhanced benefits after “completing 20 years of service as a law enforcement officer.” 5 U.S.C. § 8336(c). The basic facts relating to Hannon’s service, as set forth in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bingaman v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Fred T. Morgan v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- John A. Ryan v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crowley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Technology Licensing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Louis D. Hall, Sr. v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Watson v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Watson v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.