Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bingaman v. Department of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 23, 1997No. 96-3368PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to address petitions for review in four consolidated cases from the Merit Systems Protection Board, Bingaman v. Department of the Treasury, No. DA-0831-95-0675-I-2; Arps v. Department of the Treasury, No. DA-0842-96-0058-I-2; Kern v. Department of the Treasury, No. DA-0831-96-0063-I-2; and Adair v. Department of the Treasury, No. DA-0842-96-0068-I-2. In each case, employees of the Customs Service, within the Department of the Treasury, contend they are eligible for law-enforcement officer (LEO) retirement benefits. The Board denied relief in all…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crowley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. TM Patents, L.P v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Tunik v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Morgan v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bingaman v. Department Of The TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API