Legal Opinion
Watson v. Department of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 17, 2001No. 00-3387PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
James A. Watson et al. petition for review of the July 17, 2000 final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”), sustaining the Department of the Navy’s (“Navy” or “agency”) determination that petitioners did not satisfy the statutory and regulatory criteria for early retirement coverage as law enforcement officers (“LEO”) under the Civil Service Retirement System (“CSRS”), 5 U.S.C. § 8336(c) (1994), or the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (“FERS”), 5 U.S.C. § 8412(d) (1994). Watson v. Dep’t of the Navy, 86 M.S.P.R. 318 (2000). The petitioners are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ellis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- James T. Hannon v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Bingaman v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Fred T. Morgan v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crowley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Tunik v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Watson v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Crowley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Ronald F. Koenig v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.