Legal Opinion
In re All Cases Against Sager Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2012No. 2010-1705PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The principal issue we confront in this appeal is whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the decision of the trial court to appoint a receiver for *6Sager Corporation for the purpose of accepting service of process and marshaling assets consisting of unexhausted liability-insurance policies for asbestos-related claims filed against Sager.. Sager was an Illinois corporation that filed for dissolution in 1998 and, pursuant to Illinois law, was no longer amenable to suit after 2003. In characterizing its own opinion, the appellate court plainly stated, “The appeal before us has the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. Krafft-Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Wells Fargo Bank NA v. ArlingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bank of NY Mellon Trust Co. v. ShafferOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Blue Ash Auto Body, Inc. v. FrankOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.