Legal Opinion

Pinto v. Buckeye Union Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1992No. Docket 107996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P.J.

Garnishee defendant Buckeye Union Insurance Company appeals from a default judgment entered against it in plaintiff Diane Pinto’s garnishment action to collect on a judgment obtained in the underlying medical malpractice claim against defendants Burns Newby and Burns G. Newby, M.D., P.C. We affirm in part and remand for further proceedings.

Plaintiffs Pinto and John Pietrofesa obtained a judgment for $330,000 against the principal defendants in the underlying action. Buckeye had issued a medical malpractice insurance policy covering the principal defendants with a policy limit of $100,000. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wayne-Oakland Bank v. Brown Valley Farms, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Marposs Corp. v. Autocam Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. RistichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Neal v. NealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Safeway Ins. Co. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Welhoff v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API