Marposs Corp. v. Autocam Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from a default judgment entered by the circuit court. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
i
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in finding that a default had been properly entered. We agree.
Defendant filed a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116 and a motion for change of venue pursuant to MCR 2.223. Both motions were denied. Defendant filed an application for leave to appeal the denial of its motion for change of venue. However, defendant did not file an application for leave to appeal from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shock Bros, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Daugherty v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Levitt v. Kacy Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pulcini v. Doctor's Clinic, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hood v. HoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coleman v. GurwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Huntington National Bank v. RistichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gavulic v. BoyerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Park v. American Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Pinto v. Buckeye Union InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.