Legal Opinion
Neal v. Neal
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 1996No. Docket 173858PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, P.J.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan appeals by leave granted from a March 8, 1994, order of the Isabella Circuit Court denying its motion to intervene. Farm Bureau claims that it is entitled to intervene for the purpose of enforcing a mediation sanctions order entered against plaintiff in this negligence action against her husband, Farm Bureau’s insured. We agree and reverse and remand the case to the trial court.
Plaintiff sued her husband, Charles Neal, for negligence arising out of a one-car accident. The case went to mediation. Farm Bureau, on behalf of Mr. Neal, accepted the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Atlanta International Insurance v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Auto Club Insurance v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Cascade Electric Co. v. RiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bennett v. WeitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Dessart v. BurakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hill v. L F Transportation, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.