Legal Opinion

Bing Crosby Minute Maid Corp. v. Eaton

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1956No. L. A. 23978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial after judgment in its favor. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

As a judgment creditor of a corporation the plaintiff brought this action against a shareholder of the corporation to recover the difference between the par value of stock issued to him and the fair value of the consideration he paid for the stock. At the conclusion of the trial, the court, sitting without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment for the plaintiff. In support of his motion for a new trial the defendant assigned certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. R. H. Herron Co. v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Edgar v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Spencer v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Sherman v. S. K. D. Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Treadaway v. Camellia Convalescent Hospitals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Choy v. Ribeiro CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Treadaway v. Camellia Convalescent Hospitals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API