Legal Opinion

Finley v. Coastal Cheveolet Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1941No. 28795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

“The plaintiff must recover upon the cause of action laid in the declaration; and a verdict for the defendant is required when the cause of action thus laid is not proved, although another cause of action in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant may appear from the defendant’s testimony.” Burdette v. Crawford, 135 Ga. 577 (2) (54 S. E. 677); Napier v. Strong, 19 Ga. App. 401 (91 S. E. 579); Smith v. Hendricks, 43 Ga. App. 361, 362 (3) (158 S. E. 638); Warren v. Georgia Power Co., 58 Ga. App. 9, 15 (197 S. E. 238). Where a plaintiff sues on an alleged express contract, and the proof…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Burdette v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Shropshire v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Smith v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. King v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Dunlap Roofing & Flooring Co. v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Dunlap Roofing C. v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API