Legal Opinion

King v. Harmon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1958No. 37002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

It was not error for the court to disallow the amendment. The plaintiff's evidence showed without dispute that the plaintiff was attempting to cross the street where crossing was prohibited by a valid ordinance of the City of Atlanta. To permit the nullification of a valid law or ordinance by a custom would undermine the very foundation of our government. If the law precludes a custom from becoming a part of a contract if the custom is contrary to law the same principle would apply with even greater force here. See American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. v. Curry, 187 Ga. 342, 358…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. McBride v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. WeeklySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Maner v. DykesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Stubbs v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API