Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hendricks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1931No. 20982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Declarations of an alleged agent are not by themselves admissible to prove agency, but it may be established by proving circumstances, apparent relations, and the conduct of the parties; and where the extraneous circumstances, independently of and without regard to the declarations of the agent himself, clearly tend to establish the fact of his agency, his declarations, though inadmissible if standing alone, may, as a part of the res gestae of the transaction, be considered.” Collier v. Schoenberg, 26 Ga. App. 496 (106 S. E. 581); Render v. Hill, 30 Ga. App. 239 (117 S. E. 258).

2. While…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Abel v. Jarratt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Stoddard v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Bender v. Hill Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Collier v. SchoenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crown Carpet Mills, Inc. v. C. E. Goodroe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Thornton v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Mebane v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Warren v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Finley v. Coastal Cheveolet Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API