Legal Opinion
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Ham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 2, 1948No. 32117PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
The defendant in error has made a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the grounds that the written notice of the time and place at which the brief of evidence is to be presented to the trial judge for his approval, required by Ga. L., 1946, pp. 726,744, § 19 (Code, Ann. Supp., § 24-3364), to be given opposing counsel, was not given him, and that he did not waive the notice in writing. It appears from the record that the plaintiff in error filed a motion for new trial on January 12, 1948, the date of the original trial; and the trial court set January 29, 1948, as the date for a hearing on…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sharpe v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Kent v. Hunt & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. RheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Crosby v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Nothnagle v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.