Legal Opinion

In re A.G.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 2006No. 10-06-00107-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABATEMENT ORDER

2Per curiam

A.G.’s retained appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. Because it is unclear at this juncture whether A.G. and his parent are presently indigent, we will abate this appeal pending a hearing in the trial court to determine whether A.G. is indigent. We will withhold a ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw until this issue has been resolved.

Counsel’s motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and appears to be meritorious. See Tex.R.App. P. 6.5. In addition, counsel served a copy of the motion on A.G.’s parent.1 See In re D.A.S., 973…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re ArroyoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re K.C.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re M.A.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re AG, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  2. Terry Ray James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  3. in the Matter of K. J., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API