Legal Opinion

In re M.A.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 27, 2005No. 10-05-00086-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABATEMENT ORDER

2Per curiam

Counsel for Appellant M.A.D. filed an Anders1 brief on June 10, 2005. The Clerk of this Court notified M.A.D.’s counsel by letter dated June 13 that the appellant’s brief was deficient and that counsel had failed to provide adequate documentation demonstrating compliance with An-ders as that case has been construed by the Supreme Court of Texas for juvenile appeals and by this Court.2 The Clerk directed counsel to file an amended brief and appropriate documentation within fifteen days. To date, counsel has failed to respond. Therefore, we abate this cause to the trial court…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  4. In re D.A.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sowels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re A.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. In Re MAD, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. in the Matter of B. D. P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
  4. in the Matter of J.M.S M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  5. in the Matter of X.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API