In Re Arroyo
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The common issue presented in these two original mandamus proceedings is whether, after the 1997 amendments to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, appeal affords adequate relief from an order sustaining a contest to an affidavit of indigence and thus requiring advance payment of appellate costs, so that review by mandamus is no longer available. We hold that the amended rules make appeal an adequate remedy, and accordingly we deny both petitions.
Relator Michael T. Holloway’s appeal from an adverse judgment in the trial court is pending in the court of appeals. The record has not been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allred v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Goffney v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Pat Walker & Co., Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Cronen v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Smith v. McCorkleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- In Re Hearn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- In the interest of J.W.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Basaldua v. Hadden, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Rodgers v. Mitchell, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.