Legal Opinion
Rai v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 24, 2015No. Case No. 5:12-cv-004344-PSGPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
(Re: Docket No. 143)
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge
Each weekday, 139,582 people ride the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s bus and light rail train system.1 Richard Rosa and Walter Silveira are system operators who allege that from August 17, 2009 onward VTA subjected them to a common and unlawful compensation scheme.2 Plaintiffs say that VTA required them to “work off-the-clock without compensation” because VTA did not compensate them for “all hours worked” performing compensable work activities such as traveling to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- April Hawthorne v. Morgan & Morgan Nashville, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
- Avery v. AKIMA Support Operations, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.