Legal Opinion
Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 26, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00054Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALEC OTTO, Case No. 4:19-cv-00054-YGR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE THE REPORT OF DAVID WEISBERGER 9 v. 10 COLIN LEMAHIEU, ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 179 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff Alec Otto brings this putative class action against defendants Nano f/k/a/ 13 RaiBlocks f/k/a Hieusys, LLC (“Nano”), Colin LeMahieu, Mica Busch, Zack Shapiro, and Troy 14 Retzer (collectively, “Nano Defendants”) as well as B.G. Services SRL f/k/a BitGrail SRL f/k/a 15 Webcoin Solutions (“BitGrail”) and Francesco “The Bomber” Firano…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.