Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Undermining Zomm's breach-of-contract claim is that the amended complaint alleges that Apple began to exploit Zomm's confidential information in December 2011. FAC ¶ 25 ("Beginning in December 2011 and continuing through November 2016 ...."). December 2011 however, was after both the Wireless Leash Plus's release and the '895 Patent's publication. See FAC ¶ 20 (noting the Wireless Leash Plus's November 2011 release), '895 Patent (noting a March 10, 2011 prior publication date). And under the terms of the confidentiality agreement, information either reverse engineerable from the Wireless…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anderson Power Products, Inc. v. Bizlink Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Beatbot Technology (USA) Co., Ltd.; Deepwater Innovation Technology (Hong Kong) Limited; Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. v. Zodiac Pool Systems LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- British Telecommunications plc v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Calsoft Labs, Inc. v. PanchumarthiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Dialect, LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.