Legal Opinion

British Telecommunications plc v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 11, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00366Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § Civil Action No. 18-366-WCB IAC/INTERACTIVECORP, MATCH § GROUP, INC., MATCH GROUP, LLC, and § VIMEO, INC., § § Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is a motion by the defendants (collectively, “IAC”) for a stay of this action pending reexamination of claim 10 of

U.S. Patent No. 7,243,105

(“the ’105 patent”) by the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). The motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND The ’105 patent is owned by plaintiff British Telecommunications PLC…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API