Legal Opinion

State v. Rutledge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1924No. 4100PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The defendant was convicted of having had carnal knowledge of a female, 16 years of age and not his wife, and was sentenced to an indeterminate term in the state prison, from which judgment he has appealed.

Before his arraignment, defendant moved the court to quash the information filed against him for the reason that it was not filed within 30 days after the defendant was committed and held to answer the charge by the committing magistrate. The order committing the defendant was made on September 5, 1923, and the information;was filed on October 13, 1923, or 38 days thereafter. The motion was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Doyle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Loose v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Conners v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. ElsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Strand v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. StudhamUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API