State v. Studham
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Defendant, Clyde Lloyd Studham, appeals from a jury conviction of rape. 1 He assigns three errors: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) failure to give a cautionary instruction to the effect that a charge of rape is one easy to assert and difficult to defend; and (3) error in permitting cross-examination of the defendant in regard to a previously issued order.
The prosecutrix, Janis -, had lived with defendant in a meretricious relationship beginning in November, 1972. A son, Chad _ was born on September 14, 1973. The relationship between Janis and the defendant had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. HarlessUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HowardUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. RutledgeUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. JarrellUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LovatoUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State, in Interest of JfsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.