Legal Opinion

State v. Studham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1977No. 14911PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Defendant, Clyde Lloyd Studham, appeals from a jury conviction of rape. 1 He assigns three errors: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; (2) failure to give a cautionary instruction to the effect that a charge of rape is one easy to assert and difficult to defend; and (3) error in permitting cross-examination of the defendant in regard to a previously issued order.

The prosecutrix, Janis -, had lived with defendant in a meretricious relationship beginning in November, 1972. A son, Chad _ was born on September 14, 1973. The relationship between Janis and the defendant had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. HarlessUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. HowardUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. RutledgeUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JarrellUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LovatoUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State, in Interest of JfsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API